Paula Deen is the reigning queen of southern cooking right now. I’m sure you’ve heard the about the angry backlash she is experiencing since publicly revealing her diabetes diagnosis along with a deal with a pharmaceutical company to promote a diabetes drug. If not here’s a couple of links to fill you in:
- Paula Deen says she has type 2 diabetes
- Paula Deen Shocked By Lack Of Public Support Following Diabetes Announcement
- Paula Deen on Her Diabetes: ‘I Have No Regrets’
Paula says she has no regrets. If that is so, Paula, honey, we need to talk. I’d like to invite you to take another look at the south’s culinary heritage thru Mrs. Dull’s eyes and Weston Price’s research.
Is Paula’s Cooking Really Southern in the Traditional Sense?
Or is it the Standard American Diet (SAD) as eaten in the south? If it were just the way people in the south eat that wouldn’t account for the popularity of Paula’s recipes. It seems to me that her recipes are appealing to those with small household food budgets or those whose budgets are shrinking. This definitely describes much of the south along with wide swaths of the country in this recession. But the south has been in this economic position for a long time and has lots of practice. We’ve evolved our food traditions around making do and doing very well, thank you very much! Traditional southern food consists of local foods prepared very simply. This saved time as well as money. People ate locally because it was cheap. People who worked hard didn’t have time to make a lot of fussy foods. People with little cash money didn’t shop at the food store if they could help it.
Paula’s recipes are an extension of this kind of thinking. If a home cook in modern times has time constraints and must choose unfussy, easy to prepare foods they turn to processed foods as ingredients in their recipes. If a home cook now must buy their food as cheaply as possible they turn to the big box stores like Sam’s and Walmart. So I suppose in this limited sense Paula’s food is southern. But these same methods of containing food costs are used by cash strapped people all over this country.
I think J. Bryan Lowder at Slate sums it up nicely:
With regard to the Southern thing, I’ll start just by pointing out that Deen’s food is not so much Southern as it is working-class American. Hers are recipes with ingredients that you can easily and cheaply pick up at your local Super Wal-Mart, make in bulk, and satisfy a large swath of palates. True, it’s not particularly healthy; but if Deen has committed any real crime in her rise to fame, it’s been her conflation of what we might call a class-based style of cooking with a regional one.
Southern food writer Virginia Willis also noted in the New York Times:
Paula’s food often reflects modern cooking and convenience foods more than Southern tradition. … She feels like she cooks for ‘real people,’ and for better or worse, that is how many people in this country choose to eat.
Well, not so much choose to eat but fall into eating thru availability, low prices and advertising. Paula’s style of cooking was born not only in her heritage but in her adult life of economic hardship. She learned as a young woman how to cook for her little family on a small budget. As a restauranteur and caterer, then later as a celebrity cook she concocted outrageous dishes to wow the guests and viewers. These dishes are over the top to attract attention. And they do, lots of it. I seriously doubt that her most egregious dietary creations are eaten by anyone very often, so they are beside the point. Her heart and soul recipes however are similar to ones made by american home cooks since the introduction of processed foods on a wide scale. So I think we can best think of her cooking as an example of the Standard American Diet (SAD) with a nod to traditional southern cooking thrown in.
With lots of calories and sugar these recipes will make you a momentary hero in a household that makes frequent stops at fast food places. I remember one woman saying that Paula had made her a Rockstar in the kitchen on more than one occasion. This food fills you up and tastes good to boot. This is home cooking in a fast food nation.
This Kind of Thinking about Food is Killing Us
Making quickness and cheapness the most important factors in choosing food is killing us. Albeit, slowly, but it is making us feel pretty bad along the way. The food choices that are cheapest and easiest to find are the very worst ones we could make health wise. I won’t recap here the list of all the diet related diseases that are widespread in the western world. The media does a pretty good job of covering those. But I will bring up just one: diabetes. Many studies show that sugar consumption correlates to diabetes risk. SAD is a high sugar diet.
The way out of this conundrum of cheap and quick foods and suffering they lead to is learning to cook food in traditional ways. My heritage is one of southern cooking and I live in the south. It’s the tradition that holds the most appeal for me. But everyone should pick their own. If you live where your grandparent’s lived consider what their diet was. If you live in a new spot, look at what the people who lived there 80 years ago ate. Consider adopting their culinary traditions to help keep things local.
Keeping your food purchases local helps to improve nutrient density. Foods lose nutrients rapidly in transport. Processing also leads to a lot of nutrient loss. Local food hasn’t been thru all that. Plus, when you know the farmer you can be pretty sure of getting what you paid for.
Separation from the Land and the Broken Arrow of Southern Cooking
As we’ve become more and more distant from farming we’ve lost much of the knowledge needed to make things from scratch. Rachel at Time For Good Food has a great quote from Hugh Acheson, author of “A New Turn in the South” in her post about “Cooking like a Granny Woman”. As to claims that Southern food is inherently unhealthy, he responds:
“Southern food did not make the South unhealthy, rather a broken arrow of cookery did, one that is ultra-processed, trans fat laden, lard fried, and massively caloric. That’s not how I eat, and I eat Southern food pretty much every day of my life.”
Now, I disagree about the lard* being unhealthy, but give everything else he says here a resounding YES! When I was growing up it seemed people did their frying in Crisco not lard.
We need to mend the arrow of tradition by getting to know our local farmers, supporting them, and learning to cook from real ingredients just as our grandmothers did. We will heal ourselves in the process. Paula, I hope you will join us.
* Note that most if not all the lard at the supermarket is hydrogenated and as such is NOT a healthy choice. But it’s not too hard to make your own or buy from a reputable supplier.
Related Posts
- Paula and Pound Cake – TimeForGoodFood.blogspot.com
- Treating Diabetes: Practical Advice for Combatting a Modern Epidemic by Thomas Cowan, MD – WestonAPrice.org
- Paula Deen’s diabetes a result of unhealthy eating but don’t blame the butter – My Life in a Pyramid.
- Fat and Diabetes: Bad Press, Good Paper, and the Reemergence of Our Good Friend Glutathione – WestonAPrice.org
- Put Lard Back in your Larder – WestonAPrice.org
- Rise and Fall of Crisco – WestonAPrice.org
This post is part of Butter Believer’s Sunday School, The Healthy Home Economist’s Monday Mania, Real Food Forager’s Fat Tuesday, Weekend Gourmet Blog Carnival at Hartke Is Online, Kelly the Kitchen Kops Real Food Wednesday and Fight Back Friday at Food Renegade.




















{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
Wow, Kathy, this is a great post and I completely agree. So glad I discovered your site and thanks for linking to my post!
Thank you for the kind words! I’m so glad to find someone thinking along the same lines
I just found your blog (from the Fat Tuesday link-up) and I love it! I was raised in the south, and Paula Deen does hit the nail on the head with what I saw growing up. It’s all about rich, decadent, and easy. Nobody questioned the stuff in boxes and cans, they just made it into some fancy looking dish and served it to a crowd! I have to confess that I love this type of food, but I know better now, so we eat a much more traditional southern diet. I’ll be subscribing to your blog, for sure! I love the design!
Thanks for linking your great post to FAT TUESDAY. This was very interesting! Hope to see you next week!
http://realfoodforager.com/fat-tuesday-february-21-2012/
Thank you Jill
I’m so glad you love it
I agree about it being like the food at gatherings when I was, and maybe you too, depending on your age
growing up. Lots of rich food almost always made from boxes and cans. I still feel a little guilty thinking about it … not because I ate it but because I generally didn’t :-0 I think I was sensitive to additives as a kid. I could tell things tasted off somehow so I couldn’t bring myself to eat even under some adult pressure. But at my Grandma and Great-Grandma’s house though the food was much simpler.
I never thought of Paula’s dishes as being cheap to make. Butter and cheese are expensive. At least all that fat slows down the digestion of sugars and starches, in effect lowering the glycemic index.
Also, 80 years ago people still ate plenty of sugary desserts and white flour. All those biscuits, yum! I don’t think we should recommend that people eat like their grandparents. I think people should eat like their ancestors 400 years ago before the advent of cheap sugar & cheap flour.
So, except for the white sugar, white flour, wrong oils, and the occasional pre-made item, what don’t you like about Paula’s recipes? She mostly cooks from scratch which is more than most SAD eaters do.
She could probably diet her way out of the type 2 diabetes diagnosis. My doctor said that, for most people, within the first 5 years it is eminently curable. Just lose some weight and get more active.
I agree 400 years ago would be even better! I’ve decided to talk about our grandparents generation though because it is easy for most people to imagine changing their diets to be more like their grandparents. We can viserally imagine that diet. Smell and taste it in our imagination. And I agree that their diet included a fair amount of sugar and lots of white flour. That’s why I modify the recipes I work with from Mrs Dull’s cookbook. But there was a heck of a lot *right* about their diet too! 80 years ago diabetes cancer and heart disease were rare. They’re was not yet widespread acceptance of hydrogenated fats like margarine and shortening extruded grain cereals. Canned foods were used but still people favored fresh and many had large gardens. There was no pasteurized dairy,synthetic vitamins, soy, pink slime, high fructose corn syrup, gmo’s etc…
Sure people ate white flours and deserts but in far less quantities than SAD. Everything else is really good though so I choose to focus on those foods here. They ate lots of bone broths, gravies from those broths, aspics, fresh vegetables, grassfed beef and pastured poultry and pork. They had raw milk and cream, farm fresh raw cheese, fresh caught fish and home pickled vegetables. No wonder their health was better than ours!
As for reversing diabetes, Ive also heard that a change of diet can do it! And I hope Paula has changed hers.
I’ve posted a more detailed response to “I don’t think we should recommend that people eat like their grandparents” in my new post “Grandma Was a Real Foodie”.
My family has deep, deep Southern roots (some fought in the Revolutionary War), and I completely agree with the tragedy that Southern food has become today. If we go back 3-4 generations, we can learn some amazing lessons about living off of our own land, putting up food for the winter, and cooking hearty meals that were full of healthy fats and overflowing with homegrown veggies.
Hi Jennifer, didn’t know you where another southern girl at heart
. My Grandmother and Great-Grandmother lived together throughout most of my childhood so I remember their cooking as a combined event, though I sure my Grandma did most of the cooking. I think the one and only super unreal thing about their cooking was the Crisco. I asked my Mom about it once and it seemed she thought Crisco was just lard :-O … Sometimes I wonder if Grandma was similarly confused. Other than that it was real with some sugar and white flour, as was common at the time. I think sugar was quite expensive for poorer folk though … I still remember being reprimanded at my little friends houses for using too much of the stuff. These friends generally used Karo syrup and thought of sugar as a luxury. So I doubt tons of sugar in recipes was common. Most vintage desert recipes call for significantly less than modern deserts. And the flour wasn’t milled as thoroughly as it is today. All in all I think they were pretty close even in the 20′s and 30′s, at least in comparison to where we are today. Go back a generation or two further and things get pretty pristine.
What a great memory to have of your grandmothers cooking together! The dessert recipes from my “traditional” grandmother were crazy sweet. Both of my grandmothers became adults in the the 40′s and 50′s so modernized food was already prevalent.
They were full of butter and eggs, so there are still great things to work with. We’ll all keep working to bring those pristine foods back! Even though I have an egg allergy now and don’t eat much in the way of desserts, Chess pie and butter pie will always have a special place in my heart.
Mother and daughter cooking, that was my great-grandmother and grandma. My Great Grandma would have started cooking for a household at about 14 when she was married. That would have been about 1900 or so. Grandma married around 1920. The 40′s and 50′s generation of young homemakers was my Mom’s generation, and yes they loved their processed food shortcuts
. My Mother had me later in life so I guess my generational perspective is a bit unique. Makes me sound older than I am … heck, I’m even too young to be an official baby-boomer
I’ll have to look for Chess and butter pie … sounds yummy!
I think the Deens got the message:
“Paula Deen Loses Weight On A Low Carb Diet”
http://www.grassfedgirl.com/paula-deen-loses-weight-on-a-low-carb-diet/
Does looks like she’s eating a low-carb semi-paleo diet now … I’m glad she’s been able to lose weight. Bringing sugar in her diet way down is the biggest help I’m sure.
I have to admit, I’ve always been a bit mystified by Paula Deen’s insistence that her cooking is “Southern” cooking. Like many of us here, I grew up in the South — in my case, along the Texas Gulf Coast. Until the 1980s, nearly everything we ate came out of my grandfather’s and father’s gardens — tomatoes, cucumbers, squash, okra, melons, strawberries, blackberries, corn, bell and hot peppers, lettuces, beans of all kinds, etc. Any jellies we consumed came from the fruits that grew there, from the pears and figs from Mama’s backyard or from wild-picked dewberries and Mustang grapes. Dinner was fairly simple and filling and accompanied by both green and yellow vegetables and a starch. Rarely was anything fried. Granny’s fried chicken (yes, I had a Granny, too) was a maybe once every few months thing, usually for a picnic. Daddy made a mean chicken-fried steak, but only every so often — we couldn’t afford steak too often, frankly, even the cheap cuts used for this dish. Cobbler happened every now and then, usually as a special treat, like when my uncle and cousins helped Daddy level the house or repair the roof (if you had men working for free, you had to feed them well.) This is what I remember as Southern cooking.
{ 2 trackbacks }